List of Past Award Winners (Name/Research Area/Area of Study/School)
-
Monetary awards ranging from $50 to $350 ($350/$200/$100/50) are given to the first place, second place, third place, and honorable mention.
-
A $1,000 monetary award is given to one Grand Prize winner.
Joshua Jones
- Essential knowledge that unites humankind
- Technology / Economics
- University of Rochester(Half Hollow Hills HS)
Ivy Liang
- Computational Physics
- Computer Science
- Caltech (Montgomery Blair HS)
Penny Brant
- NASA Internship/MIT Rocket Team
- Computer Science/AI
- MIT (Phillips Exeter Academy)
Lin Jing Liu
- Women in Computing at Cornell
- CS or Operations Research
- Cornell University (BTHS)
Giovanna Napoleone
- Statistics + Medicine
- Brain tumor cell
- Columbia University (Syosset HS)
Eric Jiefei Deng
- Middle East and Mediterranean Study
- Political Science
- Columbia University
Sonia Hasko
- Statistics + IT
- Environmental Science
- Princeton University (Townsend Harris HS)
Ethan Chiu
- Biology + Computational Simulations
- Biomedical Engineering
- Yale University
Noel Cercizi (Special Award: Water Quality Research)
- Biological and Water Quality Research
- Chemistry and Psychology
- University of Chicago (BTHS)
Richard Chen (Special Award: Nano-material Research)
- Energy and Nanoengineering
- Physical Science
- UPenn
Social, Busincss and Science
We suggest human, social, phylosophy, economy and applied science researchers and students who collaborates with researchers in colleges and organizations to submit papers.
Some of the topics that we mainly accept under human, social studies, and science comprise of the following:
- Social science
- Political science
- Public health
- Psychology
- Engineering
- Science
Student Poster Presentation - Guidelines When Preparing Video Files
Please observe the following guidelines when preparing video files of your talks:
- Duration of video files: 10 minutes
- File Format: MPEG-4 (.mp4) file (use the normal H.264 video and AAC audio codecs)
- Video Size: HD (1280 x 720 or other “720p” setting)
- Audio Quality: please double check your files before submitting to make sure the audio is clear and audible!
Following the first two stages is another round of editorial review. Either the managing editor co-editors reviews each submission. For issues that are based on invitation only, submissions from those not invited will be considered as a regular submission by the editorial board. Peer reviewers will ensure that they answer the following questions in their report:
- In general, is the paper easy to follow and does it have a logical flow?
- Do the title and abstract cover the main aspects of the work?
- Are the results novel? Does the study provide an advance in the field?
- Did the study gain ethical approval appropriate to the country in which the research was performed if human or animal subjects were involved and is it stated in the manuscript?
- Does the paper raise any ethical concerns?
- Are the methods clear and replicable?
- Do all the results presented match the methods described?
- Is the statistical analysis appropriate to the study design?
- Are the controls appropriate for the study design?
- Is the data clearly and appropriately presented using clear language?
- Did the authors make the underlying data available to the readers?
- Do the conclusions correlate to the results found?
- Are the figures and tables clear and legible?
- Are images appropriate for the article? If there are any concerns about duplication or manipulation in images, please raise potential issues by email or in your report.
- Does the paper use appropriate references in the correct style to promote understanding of the content?
- Does the English grammar, punctuation or spelling need to be corrected?
Managing editors ensure that papers in NYCSEA maintain our standard; therefore our team uses discretion in rejecting submissions that do not meet our expectations. To proceed from the final round of review, all editors must vote unanimously on the submission. If conflict occurs, a third reviewer considers the submission. Submission authors reserve the right to withdraw at any time.