NYCSEA

Scope of the Paper

Scope and Selectivity

NYCSEA seeks to publish innovative scholarly manuscripts on humanities, social, phylosophy, economy and science. NYCSEA features articles that contribute in some way to the improvement of general knowledge or empirical theory defined broadly. Although we may publish a manuscript designed to propose a solution to science, social, and current world problem, we prefer to publish those that also apply theoretical ideas and findings or address general questions debated in the scholarly community.

The editorial team sends submissions, except letters to the editor, to reviewers before making a decision to publish. As approximately 30 percent of manuscripts submitted to NYCSEA are ultimately previewed by the journal boards, the standards of NYCSEA’s reviewers are high. Before submitting your work, authors are strongly encouraged to seek advice and detailed comments from colleagues.

Research Categories

Social, Busincss and Science


We suggest human, social, phylosophy, economy and applied science researchers and students who collaborates with researchers in colleges and organizations to submit papers.

Some of the topics that we mainly accept under human, social studies, and science comprise of the following:


• Social science
• Political science
• Public health
• Psychology
• Engineering
• Science

Student Poster Presentation - Guidelines When Preparing Video Files


Please observe the following guidelines when preparing video files of your talks:


• Duration of video files: 10 minutes
• File Format: MPEG-4 (.mp4) file (use the normal H.264 video and AAC audio codecs)
• Video Size: HD (1280 x 720 or other “720p” setting)
• Audio Quality: please double check your files before submitting to make sure the audio is clear and audible!

Following the first two stages is another round of editorial review. Either the managing editor co-editors reviews each submission. For issues that are based on invitation only, submissions from those not invited will be considered as a regular submission by the editorial board. Peer reviewers will ensure that they answer the following questions in their report:

• In general, is the paper easy to follow and does it have a logical flow?
• Do the title and abstract cover the main aspects of the work?
• Are the results novel? Does the study provide an advance in the field?
• Did the study gain ethical approval appropriate to the country in which the research was performed if human or animal subjects were involved and is it stated in the manuscript?
• Does the paper raise any ethical concerns?
• Are the methods clear and replicable?
• Do all the results presented match the methods described?
• Is the statistical analysis appropriate to the study design?
• Are the controls appropriate for the study design?
• Is the data clearly and appropriately presented using clear language?
• Did the authors make the underlying data available to the readers?
• Do the conclusions correlate to the results found?
• Are the figures and tables clear and legible?
• Are images appropriate for the article? If there are any concerns about duplication or manipulation in images, please raise potential issues by email or in your report.
• Does the paper use appropriate references in the correct style to promote understanding of the content?
• Does the English grammar, punctuation or spelling need to be corrected?

Managing editors ensure that papers in NYCSEA maintain our standard; therefore our team uses discretion in rejecting submissions that do not meet our expectations. To proceed from the final round of review, all editors must vote unanimously on the submission. If conflict occurs, a third reviewer considers the submission. Submission authors reserve the right to withdraw at any time.